The victim is someone I know and I can confirm that what is mentioned in this article is far from accurate. Unlike other cases, I also noticed that there is no coverage of this case in English. It was an assault case, and to say that it was a “Pergaduhan” (translated to English as “Fighting”) is totally misleading. There is also lack of consistency in reporting. In coverage of other crimes involving uniformed personnel, the affiliations, Policeman or Military Personnel, were freely mentioned, like it was no one’s business. Then, why is this case treated differently? Why does this criminal get a better treatment in reporting by leaving out his ranking and affiliation? He is a Lance Corporal in the military. He assaulted a civilian, leaving the victim with a bloody face and a permanent damage to his nose and the jerk just got fined $3,000 which he could totally afford. And yeah, he still got to keep his job. Do we want to have this kind of people in our security agencies? Would the military just let him stay knowingly that what he did contradicts with the military’s core values of Courageous, Loyal, Piety and Professional?

Get the full truth and details here [No Just-Ease]